Court Records https://forums.court-records.net/ |
|
GK Contradictions (spoilers) https://forums.court-records.net/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=15398 |
Page 3 of 9 |
Author: | FerdieLance [ Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Here's one that got me penalized: Spoiler: Case 3 |
Author: | Bad Player [ Mon Feb 22, 2010 10:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
FerdieLance wrote: Here's one that got me penalized: Spoiler: Case 3 Spoiler: case 3 |
Author: | Mr. Bear Jew [ Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
This one has been bugging for a while. Spoiler: Case 3 |
Author: | Bad Player [ Mon Feb 22, 2010 8:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Mr. Bear Jew wrote: This one has been bugging for a while. Spoiler: Case 3 The police are stupid. Contradiction solved. (It may have been Interpol, but still...) |
Author: | GigaHand [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Spoiler: 1-5, AAI-3 |
Author: | Franzise Deauxnim [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Not literally a contradiction, but... Spoiler: Case 2 |
Author: | GigaHand [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
If I recall correctly, the injury was to his upper back. Also, Lablanc not only survived but seemed completely unharmed. It was a short fall with the statue there, in any case. |
Author: | Bad Player [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 2:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
GigaHand wrote: Spoiler: 1-5, AAI-3 Spoiler: |
Author: | Franzise Deauxnim [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
GigaHand wrote: If I recall correctly, the injury was to his upper back. Also, Lablanc not only survived but seemed completely unharmed. It was a short fall with the statue there, in any case. Head and back. And I don't see how the location of his injury would change with the height of the fall. Lablanc laid there silently for at least a few minutes, so if he wasn't hurt, he at the very least had the wind knocked out of him pretty good. Not that that can really be used as a measuring stick for anyone else falling from that height anyway. |
Author: | GigaHand [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Bad Player wrote: GigaHand wrote: Spoiler: 1-5, AAI-3 Spoiler: Spoiler: Franzise Deauxnim wrote: And I don't see how the location of his injury would change with the height of the fall. I meant the fall wasn't high enough to be fatal. Edgey seemed to have gotten a wrong first impression. At least, that what it seems like to me. |
Author: | Bad Player [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Spoiler: 1-5 |
Author: | GigaHand [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 11:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Ah. Thank you. Now it makes sense. |
Author: | Franzise Deauxnim [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
GigaHand wrote: I meant the fall wasn't high enough to be fatal. Why? |
Author: | GigaHand [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Franzise Deauxnim wrote: GigaHand wrote: I meant the fall wasn't high enough to be fatal. Why? ...Ok, what? Are you asking why a fall wasn't high enough to be fatal? I would think that's self-explanatory. |
Author: | Mr. Bear Jew [ Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
GigaHand wrote: Franzise Deauxnim wrote: GigaHand wrote: I meant the fall wasn't high enough to be fatal. Why? ...Ok, what? Are you asking why a fall wasn't high enough to be fatal? I would think that's self-explanatory. The cargo hold's roof looked like it was at least 30 feet tall. That would make Hicks' fall from the top of the stairwell was about 25 feet, give or take a few. Anyone landing on their back from that height would be killed instantly, especially if they fell face first like Hicks did. |
Author: | GigaHand [ Wed Feb 24, 2010 7:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Mr. Bear Jew wrote: The cargo hold's roof looked like it was at least 30 feet tall. That would make Hicks' fall from the top of the stairwell was about 25 feet, give or take a few. Anyone landing on their back from that height would be killed instantly, especially if they fell face first like Hicks did. I was talking about Lablanc's fall. Also it wasn't face first in any case. |
Author: | Franzise Deauxnim [ Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
GigaHand wrote: Franzise Deauxnim wrote: GigaHand wrote: I meant the fall wasn't high enough to be fatal. Why? ...Ok, what? Are you asking why a fall wasn't high enough to be fatal? I would think that's self-explanatory. No, it's not. People can drown in the kitchen sink. It's very unlikely, but it's possible. You can't just dismiss the possibility that someone could die from falling a short height solely because you witnessed one other person fall from the same height and live. |
Author: | Mask*DeMasque [ Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
I just thought of something, but I'm probably wrong. Spoiler: Case 5 Spoiler: Also Case 5 |
Author: | Flodda [ Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
After i played through the game there were a lot of things still unclear for me... All following questions are SPOILERS for the WHOLE GAME, so don't read until your finished it!!! btw. english isn't my native language so maybe the grammar is sometimes a bit off Spoiler: I think there are quite a few plotholes, the previous games of this series were imo way more conclusive, but they aren't as interwoven as this one and still it's a great game and a fantastic series! Or did the translators just screw it all up and in the original version everything's explained? ^^ |
Author: | Flodda [ Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Mask*DeMasque wrote: I just thought of something, but I'm probably wrong. Spoiler: Case 5 Spoiler: Also Case 5 Spoiler: Case 5 Spoiler: Also Case 5 |
Author: | Bad Player [ Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Spoiler: Flodda's contradictions; spoilers for all cases |
Author: | GigaHand [ Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Spoiler: AAI-5 |
Author: | Hikka [ Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Spoiler: Case 5 -- Maybe reading too much into it??? ...Sorry if that doesn't make sense. *not so good at explaining stuff...* |
Author: | Bad Player [ Thu Feb 25, 2010 8:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Wooden cart? |
Author: | Percei [ Thu Feb 25, 2010 10:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Not a huge thing but... Spoiler: AAI-3 |
Author: | mdquak [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 2:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Spoiler: Case 1 |
Author: | Mask*DeMasque [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
mdquak wrote: Spoiler: Case 1 Wow, it looks like you're right! That's a pretty big contradiction, though; they messed up very badly. |
Author: | TheSteelSamurai [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Percei wrote: Not a huge thing but... Spoiler: AAI-3 That's the case with a lot of the evidence in the Ace Attorney series. It's not always stuff that you physically have on your person. It is often just information-stuff you know about. And weren't the mirror shards actually acquired from inside the badger costume head? |
Author: | TheSteelSamurai [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Hikka wrote: Spoiler: Case 5 -- Maybe reading too much into it??? ...Sorry if that doesn't make sense. *not so good at explaining stuff...* The cart is wooden. And don't bodies often float, thus why people use stuff to make them sink so they won't be easily found?O_o |
Author: | TheSteelSamurai [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:51 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Flodda wrote: After i played through the game there were a lot of things still unclear for me... All following questions are SPOILERS for the WHOLE GAME, so don't read until your finished it!!! btw. english isn't my native language so maybe the grammar is sometimes a bit off Spoiler: 2. Well, we know Portsman got his orders from the smuggling ring's leader. All those peices of evidence are kind of connected with the ring. The necklace belonged to the man who was falsely-convicted of having ties to the ring, and it had his real name on the back. The gun was used by the son of one of the bigger people in the ring to commit murder. And the video...well that is addressed in the game. 3. From what we are told, it seems that the goal of the ring was to acquire the real statue after selling it to someone. Thus, they get the money and the statue, which they can then sell to someone else. 9. Silencer?O_O |
Author: | valentinite [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 5:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Spoiler: Mention of an item you get early in case 2 |
Author: | Hikka [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
TheSteelSamurai wrote: Hikka wrote: Spoiler: Case 5 -- Maybe reading too much into it??? ...Sorry if that doesn't make sense. *not so good at explaining stuff...* The cart is wooden. And don't bodies often float, thus why people use stuff to make them sink so they won't be easily found?O_o ...Point taken. For some reason just thought they didn't. ._.u *SHOT.* |
Author: | Mr. Bear Jew [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Hikka wrote: Spoiler: Case 5 -- Maybe reading too much into it??? ...Sorry if that doesn't make sense. *not so good at explaining stuff...* Bodies can float whether they're living or non-living. |
Author: | Franzise Deauxnim [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 1:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
GigaHand wrote: Spoiler: AAI-5 Spoiler: |
Author: | CrimsonV [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 6:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
This might have been already reported, I haven't looked at certain non-defined spoiler posts not to ruin the last case -which I almost finished-. AAI case 3 : Spoiler: I hope it was clear enough. |
Author: | valentinite [ Fri Feb 26, 2010 9:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
CrimsonV wrote: This might have been already reported, I haven't looked at certain non-defined spoiler posts not to ruin the last case -which I almost finished-. AAI case 3 : Spoiler: I hope it was clear enough. Spoiler: Also for case 3, duh! |
Author: | Percei [ Sat Feb 27, 2010 1:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
I also agree with CrimsonV Spoiler: AAI-3 |
Author: | Jeshi [ Sat Feb 27, 2010 3:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Am I the only one that spotted this? I'm surprised nobody else has brought this up. Spoiler: Case 2 |
Author: | Bad Player [ Sat Feb 27, 2010 3:38 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Spoiler: case 2 |
Author: | Jeshi [ Sat Feb 27, 2010 4:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: GK Contradictions (spoilers) |
Bad Player wrote: Spoiler: case 2 Spoiler: case 2 |
Page 3 of 9 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |