Court Records
https://forums.court-records.net/

Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
https://forums.court-records.net/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=30577		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Kevin Ace Attorney [ Fri Jul 04, 2014 4:45 am ]
Post subject:  Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Which characters you want to see in a possible sequel? I would love to see Miles, Franzy, and Gumshoe?
Author:  Nurio [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 3:12 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Terribly off topic, but there won't ever be an on-topic moment for this, so please forgive me.

Is it just me or is your font incredibly difficult to read? I have to actually highlight it for me to even be able to read it.
Author:  Ash [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 6:11 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Not just you. I'm using an older forum skin, and I can't hardly see there's any text written in the first place. To be honest, I don't even bother trying to read his posts, as I would have to highlight them every single time...
Author:  Nearavex [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:10 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
I don't think any more of AA characters in a crossover would do any good - after all, if there is a sequel, I believe it will be handled in a similar manner when it comes to the setting and the characters. It was fine for Layton's policepeople in London, but only because their role in the story was pretty minor altogether.

The only exception I can think of are Mia, who can be channeled by Maya, and Pearl, because she's a part of the assistant team already. That being said, it would be unfair to add Pearl and keep Flora out of the game, so I assume she'd have to be there as well? Still, I don't know if she joined Layton and Luke at that point in time, so...
Author:  Nurio [ Tue Jul 08, 2014 3:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Nearavex wrote:
I don't think any more of AA characters in a crossover would do any good - after all, if there is a sequel, I believe it will be handled in a similar manner when it comes to the setting and the characters. It was fine for Layton's policepeople in London, but only because their role in the story was pretty minor altogether.

The only exception I can think of are Mia, who can be channeled by Maya, and Pearl, because she's a part of the assistant team already. That being said, it would be unfair to add Pearl and keep Flora out of the game, so I assume she'd have to be there as well? Still, I don't know if she joined Layton and Luke at that point in time, so...

PLvsAA definitely takes place after Curious Village because
Spoiler: Curious Village and Pandora's Box
Professor Layton knows Chelmey in PLvsAA, whom he only met for real in Pandora's Box, after Flora joined in Curious Village.


Ash wrote:
Not just you. I'm using an older forum skin, and I can't hardly see there's any text written in the first place. To be honest, I don't even bother trying to read his posts, as I would have to highlight them every single time...

Good to know. Hopefully he'll change his font for the sake of readability.
Author:  Going for Miles [ Mon Jul 21, 2014 9:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
MAYA THE IRONCLAD.
Author:  Rubia Ryu the Royal [ Tue Jul 22, 2014 12:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
And next time, have Nick be the damsel in distress.
Author:  TaylorHyuuga [ Fri Sep 05, 2014 4:07 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Is it wrong that I sorta want some of the characters from the first one to make an appearance in the potential sequel? Like Barnham, Kira, or Greyerl.
Author:  Feriku [ Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Even before the crossover came out, I decided I wanted a sequel filled with swordfighting--Simon Blackquill vs. Jean Descole!

TaylorHyuuga wrote:
Is it wrong that I sorta want some of the characters from the first one to make an appearance in the potential sequel? Like Barnham, Kira, or Greyerl.


Barnham! Definitely Barnham.
Author:  TaylorHyuuga [ Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Feriku wrote:
Even before the crossover came out, I decided I wanted a sequel filled with swordfighting--Simon Blackquill vs. Jean Descole!

TaylorHyuuga wrote:
Is it wrong that I sorta want some of the characters from the first one to make an appearance in the potential sequel? Like Barnham, Kira, or Greyerl.


Barnham! Definitely Barnham.


I knew someone would reply that to me. It was just a matter of when.
Author:  Danchat [ Wed Sep 10, 2014 10:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Feriku wrote:
Even before the crossover came out, I decided I wanted a sequel filled with swordfighting--Simon Blackquill vs. Jean Descole!

TaylorHyuuga wrote:
Is it wrong that I sorta want some of the characters from the first one to make an appearance in the potential sequel? Like Barnham, Kira, or Greyerl.


Barnham! Definitely Barnham.

I would absolutely endorse this battle. How about Simon Blackquill VS Jean Descole VS Zacharias Barnham VS Professor Layton in a epic swordfight to the death? Yes, I think that'll be the title of the sequel.
Author:  Mimi Wright [ Thu Sep 11, 2014 12:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
I would love to see Flora and maybe Pearl to appear next time. Oh Gumshoe!! :D

As much as I am dreaming and hoping for a sequel, what do you think the chances are of actually getting a sequel?
Author:  TheBlackquillz [ Thu Sep 11, 2014 2:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Mimi Wright wrote:
I would love to see Flora and maybe Pearl to appear next time. Oh Gumshoe!! :D

As much as I am dreaming and hoping for a sequel, what do you think the chances are of actually getting a sequel?

Flora and Pearl = Perfect duo
Gumshoe = YEEEEEES

And as for the chances of a sequel? Hmmm... I see it now... Zvarri! 1/80 CHANCE, so basically probably no sequel.

But we still have hopes! :trucy:
Author:  Going for Miles [ Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Image
Author:  Scent [ Sat Sep 13, 2014 1:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Inquisitor Zacharias Barnham needs to be in a sequel. Phoenix was beginning to build his character with the concept of "truth above the verdict", but he was literally brushed aside during the last hours of the game. So if he returns as an inquisitor (or prosecutor, seeing as how Labyrinthia could be a developed city by now), they need to give him sufficient exposure.
Author:  TaylorHyuuga [ Sun Sep 14, 2014 1:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Scent wrote:
Inquisitor Zacharias Barnham needs to be in a sequel. Phoenix was beginning to build his character with the concept of "truth above the verdict", but he was literally brushed aside during the last hours of the game. So if he returns as an inquisitor (or prosecutor, seeing as how Labyrinthia could be a developed city by now), they need to give him sufficient exposure.


They said in one of the Special Episodes that they were keeping Labyrinthia in it's old style, since they're more used to it. Granted, these episodes break the fourth wall constantly, so believe it if you will.
Author:  Feriku [ Mon Sep 15, 2014 1:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
Danchat wrote:
Feriku wrote:
Even before the crossover came out, I decided I wanted a sequel filled with swordfighting--Simon Blackquill vs. Jean Descole!

TaylorHyuuga wrote:
Is it wrong that I sorta want some of the characters from the first one to make an appearance in the potential sequel? Like Barnham, Kira, or Greyerl.


Barnham! Definitely Barnham.

I would absolutely endorse this battle. How about Simon Blackquill VS Jean Descole VS Zacharias Barnham VS Professor Layton in a epic swordfight to the death? Yes, I think that'll be the title of the sequel.


BEST SEQUEL EVER!
I would buy it immediately.

Scent wrote:
Inquisitor Zacharias Barnham needs to be in a sequel. Phoenix was beginning to build his character with the concept of "truth above the verdict", but he was literally brushed aside during the last hours of the game. So if he returns as an inquisitor (or prosecutor, seeing as how Labyrinthia could be a developed city by now), they need to give him sufficient exposure.


Agreed 100%!
Author:  dimentiorules [ Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
I'd personally like to see Apollo appear in a potential sequel. Apollo never appears in any spinoffs or crossover games, he should get more time in the spotlight. I'd like to see Gumshoe meet Chelmey, the dialogue that would ensue from there would be pure gold! I'd like to see Edgeworth have an actual role in the story this time instead of a mere cameo and an appearance in one of the special episodes. I'd also like to see The Phantom meet Don Paolo or Jean Descole, as they share many similarities, but alas, that's probably never going to happen. I'm pretty sure that PLvsPWAA isn't canon to either the Ace Attorney or Professor Layton series, so you could probably do anything, like bring back dead characters.
Author:  Ropfa [ Fri Oct 24, 2014 5:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Which Character's should be in a possible sequell?
GoingforMiles wrote:
Image


This is beautiful.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/