Court Records https://forums.court-records.net/ |
|
Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) https://forums.court-records.net/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=31978 |
Page 4 of 5 |
Author: | Lhancat [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 1:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Yeah I honestly didn't like Athena at all in this case. So childish and immature, she makes kid Pearl look like a grown up! |
Author: | FenrirDarkWolf [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 1:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Lhancat wrote: Yeah I honestly didn't like Athena at all in this case. So childish and immature, she makes kid Pearl look like a grown up! She gets better in Case 4, at least. |
Author: | scarlet-flowers [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
FenrirDarkWolf wrote: scarlet-flowers wrote: linkenski wrote: I can't really think of any beyond "It would be cool" or "I don't want to write two entire days of this case. It's too much plotting!" Late reply, but possible justification is that Retinez said he would seize the WAA by tomorrow if Trucy wasn't proven innocent by then, so they had to do it in one go. I thought in an interview they stated that Case 2 was condensed so Case 4 could be placed in the main game. I'm not complaining tho, I love them both. I'm talking about in-game justification. |
Author: | Ash [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
MBr wrote: Ash wrote: Spoiler: Spoiler: Precisely. Most people will notice it by the time they get to the end of the game, I hope, but the game really has one clear overarching theme for the whole game, in various forms. |
Author: | Going for Miles [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 2:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: T-talk to the hand! KA-POW! |
Author: | MBr [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
She seemed to act the same as she did in any other DD investigation. She was better in 6-4 than 5-3, at least. |
Author: | Pierre [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Ugh divinginto the actual trial I feel there's more "ugh this argument totally works" moments than ever. An Athena's counselling sessions still seem as forced and inadmissable as ever. Hell if it hadn't been for the ONLY judge they would never have gotten away with it. |
Author: | Blizdi [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Pierre wrote: Ugh divinginto the actual trial I feel there's more "ugh this argument totally works" moments than ever. An Athena's counselling sessions still seem as forced and inadmissable as ever. Hell if it hadn't been for the ONLY judge they would never have gotten away with it. Of course there is more of those, the whole point of that case was Spoiler: |
Author: | Bad Player [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Blizdi wrote: Pierre wrote: Ugh divinginto the actual trial I feel there's more "ugh this argument totally works" moments than ever. An Athena's counselling sessions still seem as forced and inadmissable as ever. Hell if it hadn't been for the ONLY judge they would never have gotten away with it. Of course there is more of those, the whole point of that case was Spoiler: that's every case, and it doesn't excuse mediocre game design |
Author: | Coffee Prosecutor [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
I have only one word for this case. Spoiler: |
Author: | Blizdi [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 4:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Bad Player wrote: Blizdi wrote: Pierre wrote: Ugh divinginto the actual trial I feel there's more "ugh this argument totally works" moments than ever. An Athena's counselling sessions still seem as forced and inadmissable as ever. Hell if it hadn't been for the ONLY judge they would never have gotten away with it. Of course there is more of those, the whole point of that case was Spoiler: that's every case, and it doesn't excuse mediocre game design And? It's not mediocre game design we're talking about. So I don't know where that came from |
Author: | Bad Player [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 8:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
having valid contradictions that the game doesn't acknowledge is mediocre design |
Author: | Pierre [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Bad Player wrote: having valid contradictions that the game doesn't acknowledge is mediocre design The one early on that bothered me most is: Spoiler: |
Author: | Lhancat [ Mon Sep 12, 2016 11:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Finished this case last night. Best Case 2 in the entire franchise for me. I loved everything about it, and it's so refreshing to see Trucy return to form after being flanderized so much in DD. Roger Retinz is also my favourite new character by far. So much charisma! |
Author: | Pierre [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 9:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: Second Half of the Trial |
Author: | Blizdi [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Pierre wrote: Spoiler: Second Half of the Trial It doesn't though, how many TV shows have 'pranks' that they pull? You can't use a pre-agreed to script as grounds of ill intent. |
Author: | Pierre [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Blizdi wrote: Pierre wrote: Spoiler: Second Half of the Trial It doesn't though, how many TV shows have 'pranks' that they pull? You can't use a pre-agreed to script as grounds of ill intent. Yeah but... Spoiler: Second half of the trial Anyway I've finished the case now and it was pretty good overall. Really glad to have Trucy back on form and to see that Gramaryes are well-recognised. The murder plan was also pretty interesting. Spoiler: Whole trial |
Author: | MBr [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 1:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: |
Author: | linkenski [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 4:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Lhancat wrote: Finished this case last night. Best Case 2 in the entire franchise for me. I loved everything about it, and it's so refreshing to see Trucy return to form after being flanderized so much in DD. Roger Retinz is also my favourite new character by far. So much charisma! What, didn't you like The Stolen Turnabout!? |
Author: | JovahexeonAceVexeon [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 7:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
linkenski wrote: Lol, I picked the wrong answer and the Judge referenced Recipe for Turnabout Heh, that's not all, they even reference Spoiler: |
Author: | scarlet-flowers [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 7:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Pierre wrote: Blizdi wrote: Pierre wrote: Spoiler: Second Half of the Trial It doesn't though, how many TV shows have 'pranks' that they pull? You can't use a pre-agreed to script as grounds of ill intent. Yeah but... Spoiler: Second half of the trial Spoiler: |
Author: | Danchat [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 8:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Quote: Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | JovahexeonAceVexeon [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 10:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Danchat wrote: Quote: Spoiler: Spoiler: To be fair, Spoiler: |
Author: | Pierre [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 10:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
JovahexeonAceVexeon wrote: Danchat wrote: Quote: Spoiler: Spoiler: To be fair, Spoiler: Counterpoint: Spoiler: |
Author: | Rubia Ryu the Royal [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 10:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Relax, guys, Perceive returns to court... just a bit late in the game. |
Author: | Pierre [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 10:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Rubia Ryu the Royal wrote: Relax, guys, Perceive returns to court... just a bit late in the game. Nah I'm not worried about that... Spoiler: |
Author: | JovahexeonAceVexeon [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Pierre wrote: JovahexeonAceVexeon wrote: To be fair, Spoiler: Counterpoint: Spoiler: Counter-Counterpoint: Spoiler: |
Author: | Pierre [ Tue Sep 13, 2016 11:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
JovahexeonAceVexeon wrote: Pierre wrote: JovahexeonAceVexeon wrote: To be fair, Spoiler: Counterpoint: Spoiler: Counter-Counterpoint: Spoiler: Counter-Counter-Counterpoint: Spoiler: |
Author: | JovahexeonAceVexeon [ Wed Sep 14, 2016 3:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Pierre wrote: Counter-Counter-Counterpoint: Spoiler: Ahem, Counter-Counter-Counterpoint Turnabout time! Spoiler: That said, now what I would find and agree to be a missed opportunity would be Spoiler: |
Author: | JesusMonroe [ Fri Sep 16, 2016 3:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
So between DD and this game I replayed the original trilogy + AJ (didn't have much desire to go into AAI since I've already replayed that a while ago and AAI2 is very recent/I know it well/very long). This pretty much made me realize how much I loved the original trilogy, yet I still do hold all the games (except PLvAA) very dear to me I'm going very slow through this game, partially because I want it to last and partially because I have school. Anyway, huge wall of text incoming: Spoiler: Case 2 Edit: Also Nayuta's "Satora!" was really cool but his "Objection!" was really, really weak. Like, one rung above Calisto |
Author: | Pierre [ Fri Sep 16, 2016 4:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA....there is something HILARIOUS in your description of the case JM. Still tag that paragraph man...you've revealed the whole trick. |
Author: | JesusMonroe [ Fri Sep 16, 2016 5:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Oh whoops, didn't realize it was general discussion. Thanks |
Author: | linkenski [ Fri Sep 16, 2016 7:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
JesusMonroe wrote: Nayuta was...eh. I've complained before that the only trick Godot knew how to use was "But do you have proof?", yet I don't even know what tricks Nayuta had. I thought this as well, but by the end of case 3's first trial you'll know ;) I thought he started to get really annoying in that case, but then that changed in a split second by the near end of that trial. |
Author: | Jean Descole [ Fri Sep 16, 2016 9:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
JesusMonroe wrote: Spoiler: Case 2 Spoiler: |
Author: | Bad Player [ Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
JesusMonroe wrote: Spoiler: Case 2 Spoiler: |
Author: | linkenski [ Fri Sep 16, 2016 11:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: 6-2 & DD |
Author: | JesusMonroe [ Sat Sep 17, 2016 1:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Bad Player wrote: JesusMonroe wrote: Spoiler: Case 2 Spoiler: Spoiler: linkenski wrote: Spoiler: 6-2 & DD Spoiler: |
Author: | EdgeworthxOldbag [ Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
On another topic, somebody said Case 2 was cut kinda short, for Case 4 I guess thats why it was so short Spoiler: whole case |
Author: | luck [ Mon Sep 19, 2016 8:20 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
EdgeworthxOldbag wrote: On another topic, somebody said Case 2 was cut kinda short, for Case 4 I guess thats why it was so short Spoiler: whole case Spoiler: |
Author: | JesusMonroe [ Tue Sep 20, 2016 12:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
The villain of this case was really something else, especially that breakdown Spoiler: |
Page 4 of 5 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |