Quote:
Lol Pierre. You are basically giving Kenny a free card, as if he shouldn't be held responsible for his own actions. "Kenny is a victim, Kenny is emotionally damaged, therefore he is justified in anything he does, even murder. If somebody tries to manipulate Kenny and ends up being killed, it is their fault for messing with Kenny in the first place". If Kenny murders Jane, it is her fault. Really? She manipulated the whole situation, but let's not forget that Kenny is a human being who is free to make choices. The line of reasoning you are using here to defend Kenny could be used to defend nearly any murderer with anger issues on Earth. Somebody messes up with an angry guy and gets killed. "It is the victim's fault for messing up with this guy who is emotionally fragile/hitting his weak spot". The single fact that killing someone is an idea that comes to Kenny's mind so quickly shows how much of a dangerous person he is.
That's fair to an extent, Kenny did snap and attack Jane I'm not arguing that or saying he's guilt free. That doesn't mean Jane gets off scot free as well. The whole scenario did not need to happen as Jane had escaped safely with the baby. She CHOSE to provoke Kenny with the clear mind of starting a fight. Also you say that it's not a defence but:
Indiana law states, "A person who recklessly, knowingly or intentionally engages in conduct that is likely to provoke a reasonable man to commit battery commits provocation." so there is the possibility that in some places this is considered a defence.
At the very least yes...temporary psychosis and insanity ARE considered legal defences as well absolving the perpetrator of full responsibility. If someone snaps to the point of losing reason then yes it can result in diminished responsibility verdicts. Jane knew the outcome of her actions, Kenny wasn't right but Jane still shares part responsibility with him, arguably more so since she fabricated the situation.
Quote:
I don't hate Kenny. I dislike him, but I don't hate him. He pissed me off a lot during the first season, yes, because he is the kind of personality I despise the most. Being "loyal" is not enough to make me like a character. One of my first experiences with him: he left me to die in the pharmacy because I didn't side with him during his argument with Lilly. Later on, he was all pissed off at me because I didn't agree with his decision to smash Larry's head in front of Lilly. He was very desperate and willing to kill anyone who could potentially turn into a walker in the same second, but he put the whole group in danger because he didn't want to acknowledge that his son was bitten. He was hostile and impatient towards everyone, or 80% of the characters. In Season 1, the only thing he cares about is his family and himself. Kenny cares about a small amount of specific people, but he doesn't really give a damn about most of his peers/people who are in groups with him. This is shown when he gets impatient with Omid and doesn't want to let him rest. And again, he gets pissed off at you for saving Ben's life, and the worst of all: he won't help Lee to search for Clementine in the end of S1, just because you didn't agree with all his decisions (and you have to hear all that obnoxious self-righteous speech about being a Christian man). Your whole argument of "Kenny can put aside his issues when it matters" falls apart with all these facts.
No...it really doesn't...in fact if anything the timing of your points actually supports my arguments. While I'd accept that Kenny is a human and so can pretty much do anything and not be consistent in his attitudes the timing of these suggests substantial growth in Kenny. In season 1 your examples show him in an extremely negative light but it doesn't cancel out my examples from season 2. Both exist in a continuum however my examples happen later on which would indicate...growth in Kenny. That he can change or at least has capacity for both great kindness and cruelty like any human being.
Quote:
Then Season 2 comes, and it is shown that he hasn't developed at all; his behavior becomes progressively worse and he puts you/the whole group in needless dangerous situations multiple times. I could make a big list here of his fuck ups. One of the first ones probably being trying to pick up a fight with Carver's people, when his group clearly outnumbered Kenny's group (nice one, Ken). He will blame Clementine for Sarita's death, even if she tries to save her (my case). He refuses to let Rebecca rest. He was responsible for almost everything that happened during the last episode. He will beat the hell out of Arvo, even if you do everything you can do to make him stop (he doesn't listen to reason). Bonnie and Mike left the group and joined Arvo because of Kenny's behavior. I was ready to leave/kill Kenny at the moment Arvo shot Clementine, even before the whole fight between Kenny and Jane.
Which really challenges the concept of "he hasn't developed at all". I'm not going to blame him for wanting to try and save people from Carver as he cared deeply about them and when people got threatened and he was safe he chose to submit at let his friends live. Jane would have walked off and protected herself if she had been holding the rifle.
Additionally Sarita's death is not really anyone's fault but it can be a "bit" more Clementine's fault. If you choose to chop off the hand, the pain causes Sarita to scream outloud which causes a far...far more immediate death than the prolonged outcome so it is partly Clementine's fault. However considering the man just lost his wife I'm not going to judge him too harshly for how unreasonable he is at that point. If anything I found it amazingly impressive how he was able to pull it together in the end of that episode to organise everyone and deliver the baby in spite of his soul-crushing loss.
Additionally while we're still dodging the crux issue here: Jane is the one who set Arvo against the party in the first place resulting in Arvo working against them. Kenny might have beat him but that's only when they captured him AFTER the fight caused by Jane. Arvo had legitimately tried to kill most of the party at this point. I think you are misappropriating blame here, we could lay it squarely at Arvo's feet. Mike and Bonnie leaving was also pretty despicable considering Kenny had spent a while fixing the car up for them. You seem willing to hold Kenny accountable for his behaviour so why not other people? Mike Bonnie and Arvo were shown to be real dirtbags in that episode and they were far more rational in their actions than Kenny was in the finale.
Again...I really think you are letting your hatred of Kenny cloud your judgement.
Quote:
It is funny how basically no character in the game likes Kenny, with very few exceptions, and the players worship him like a God. Lilly doesn't like Kenny, Christa doesn't like Kenny, Jane doesn't like Kenny, Molly doesn't like Kenny, Luke is not a fan of Kenny's either. Lee constantly got into conflict with Kenny. This is how difficult to deal with he is.
Christa didn't like many people and was watchful of others, Lilly was power-hungry and mad, Molly was a loner who used the party for her temporary needs, Luke is an idiot who compromised the safety of the whole party because he got a boner and Lee is presented as a neutral party a lot of the time. I sided with Kenny on many things and so there wasn't as much conflict as you might think. As such I'd remove Lee from that list.
Now let's consider you said "No character in the game likes Kenny"
His Wife...his son...his second wife...the small family he managed to build around himself by season 2. Clem arguably considering how they meet in season 2.
Quote:
The main point is, even if Kenny doesn't directly hurt Clementine, he puts her in dangerous situations because of his personality. He may have good intentions when it comes to Clementine, but guess what, the road to hell is paved with good intentions. He has a tragic story? Ok, but so does virtually every character in the game, including Jane. It is funny how Kenny's backstory justifies his violence, but Jane's backstory can't justify her coldness and lack of trust. Lilly is a psycho, Larry is a psycho, Jane is a psycho, Ben is a demon, only Kenny is a saint and justified in his actions.
The difference between Kenny and Jane is important...yes her coldness and lack of trust is justified but that still allows for rational thought that she used against the party. For Kenny his backstory led to a loss of control that he can't be held accountable for. It's the difference between someone who has the power to stop something and someone who doesn't. Kenny was helpless, Jane wasn't.
Also Lilly WAS a psycho...even if you side with her she outright steals your van and runs off!
Quote:
EDIT: Plus, Jane is not as bad as you are painting her here. Sure, she doesn't trust/care about most people (her backstory justifies why), but she has shown to genuinely care about Clementine and saved her life at least twice. When she decided to return to the group, it is clear that she is a little more willing to compromise and be somewhat flexible for the sake of living with a group. Her decision in the end was wrong, but she wouldn't have put her life at risk and get into a fight with Kenny to show his true colors if she didn't care about Clementine. Why is Kenny's attachment to Clementine any more genuine than Jane's attachment to Clementine is?
It's an impossible question to have a right or wrong answer to. I'll grant that's she grew somewhat when she returned to the group but she swiftly reverted on that towards the end where she manipulated Kenny into snapping. You could also argue that she cares more about herself in saving Clementine. Having become dependent on Clementine she is basically unhealthily using her for her own benefit.
I'll point out that in the end of the day...Kenny was capable of giving up Clementine and the Baby to ensure their safety.