Page 1 of 1[ 17 posts ]
Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
Perfect whine record
Gender: Male
Location: The Loser's Shack
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:21 am
Posts: 262
-He tried to 'kill' Dahlia even though it could be a nine year old.
-He tried to pin the blame on Iris (sort of).
Discuss.
Oh, and 'ye its justified, he's badsass' is not an option.
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
...Hopefully someday... xD
Gender: None specified
Location: Suomi, Finland, Perkele!
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:05 pm
Posts: 3393
Personally; I think he first was after justice, but it changed to revenge when he saw Dolly again.
Understandable though, but like he said; he could have kill'd a child if the plan would have been succeeded.
Enev though he really did seem to regret hes actions, I think it was more like revenge than justice in the end.
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
OH DESIRE
Gender: Female
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:11 am
Posts: 69
- I think... that his heart was in the right place, but as the both of you mentioned before me, revenge may have become an ideal and taken over his original goal?
Regardless of his intent, I can't really see him as a diabolical character -- it's not like he had planned to murder her for his own gain or something. Regardless of how cloudy his goals became, he was still working in the protection of Maya...
If my thoughts are incorrect or something, forgive me -- I haven't played T&T since like, last February. XD;;
eat your vegetables, son.
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
Perpetual Prosecutor
Gender: Male
Location: Wherever, whenever, whatever.
Rank: Medium-in-training
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 350
He didn't think about the fact that someone was channeling Dahlia. He wanted revenge for the woman who ruined his life, and he wanted to protect Maya. Heck, I would have probably killed her too in that kind of situation.
He has NEVER accused Iris. He was pressuring Wright to see if he could make it alone. He never wanted to blame Iris, but himself, but, seeing it as an opportunity to prove Wright sucks compared to Mia, he didn't reveal it initially and instead "tested" Wright.
'Nuff said.
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
The Law 'Shark'
Gender: None specified
Rank: Medium-in-training
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:43 pm
Posts: 565
Quote:
He kept the letter where it was because he wanted to get Maya in danger and then save her himself.
He didn't think about the fact that someone was channeling Dahlia. He wanted revenge for the woman who ruined his life, and he wanted to protect Maya. Heck, I would have probably killed her too in that kind of situation.
He has NEVER accused Iris. He was pressuring Wright to see if he could make it alone. He never wanted to blame Iris, but himself, but, seeing it as an opportunity to prove Wright sucks compared to Mia, he didn't reveal it initially and instead "tested" Wright.
'Nuff said.
He didn't think about the fact that someone was channeling Dahlia. He wanted revenge for the woman who ruined his life, and he wanted to protect Maya. Heck, I would have probably killed her too in that kind of situation.
He has NEVER accused Iris. He was pressuring Wright to see if he could make it alone. He never wanted to blame Iris, but himself, but, seeing it as an opportunity to prove Wright sucks compared to Mia, he didn't reveal it initially and instead "tested" Wright.
'Nuff said.
I shall do the lazy thing and Say '^ This!'
~Beware of the Shark - He'll bite!~
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
Gender: None specified
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:25 am
Posts: 3541
Akiak wrote:
He has NEVER accused Iris. He was pressuring Wright to see if he could make it alone. He never wanted to blame Iris, but himself, but, seeing it as an opportunity to prove Wright sucks compared to Mia, he didn't reveal it initially and instead "tested" Wright.
I question whether Godot held something against Iris; the only role she had in his plan was to take the fall if things went bad.
And no, I don't think putting the entire Fey family in mortal danger just so he could play hero and satisfy his own ego is justifiable in any way. He wasn't interested in protecting Maya at all; saying 'oh, he saved her!' after he put her into that position is like applauding someone who called the fire department to report a burning building after HE started the blaze.
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
GANTALITY!
Gender: None specified
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 1150
"So apparently P/I fan + Insecurity + airheadedness + strange kinks + bad grasp of reality + over eagerness = bad user........." D= /D\
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
Gender: None specified
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 2:25 am
Posts: 3541
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
GANTALITY!
Gender: None specified
Rank: Ace Attorney
Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 1150
Franzise Deauxnim wrote:
So you think putting Maya's life in danger was fine but stabbing her assailant wasn't?
Yes, even her mother was on board with that. Maya is a magnet for danger as it is, might as well capitalize on it. Can not keep her safe all the time.
"So apparently P/I fan + Insecurity + airheadedness + strange kinks + bad grasp of reality + over eagerness = bad user........." D= /D\
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
Perpetual Prosecutor
Gender: Male
Location: Wherever, whenever, whatever.
Rank: Medium-in-training
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 1:30 pm
Posts: 350
Franzise Deauxnim wrote:
Akiak wrote:
He has NEVER accused Iris. He was pressuring Wright to see if he could make it alone. He never wanted to blame Iris, but himself, but, seeing it as an opportunity to prove Wright sucks compared to Mia, he didn't reveal it initially and instead "tested" Wright.
I question whether Godot held something against Iris; the only role she had in his plan was to take the fall if things went bad.
And no, I don't think putting the entire Fey family in mortal danger just so he could play hero and satisfy his own ego is justifiable in any way. He wasn't interested in protecting Maya at all; saying 'oh, he saved her!' after he put her into that position is like applauding someone who called the fire department to report a burning building after HE started the blaze.
Forgive us Godot fans.
Besides, it was for both revenge and Maya protection. Maybe more for revenge though, as suggested towards the end.
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
The Law 'Shark'
Gender: None specified
Rank: Medium-in-training
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:43 pm
Posts: 565
It was only carried out BECAUSE of his own anger and hate...which logically, anyone would probably do themselves in that scenario.
~Beware of the Shark - He'll bite!~
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
Just a random passerby
Gender: Male
Location: Hyrule
Rank: Prosecutor
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 4:42 pm
Posts: 623
Spoiler: text
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
Perfect whine record
Gender: Male
Location: The Loser's Shack
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 9:21 am
Posts: 262
rydus65 wrote:
Spoiler: text
Very, very much agreed.
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
sig+avi made by krazykaro
Gender: Female
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:56 pm
Posts: 170
LyingColdly wrote:
-The case wouldn't have happened, at all, if he would've just hid the letter when he found it.
-He tried to 'kill' Dahlia even though it could be a nine year old.
-He tried to pin the blame on Iris (sort of).
Discuss.
Oh, and 'ye its justified, he's badsass' is not an option.
-He tried to 'kill' Dahlia even though it could be a nine year old.
-He tried to pin the blame on Iris (sort of).
Discuss.
Oh, and 'ye its justified, he's badsass' is not an option.
godot is not a bad ass!!!
i mean, what would you do when youre in his position, he of course thought iris was dahlia (when you saw that picture of oh cult, who didn't???) so he pinned the murder on her,
because its her fault he has that (awesome) mask
proud daughter of Romeo and krazykaro
brothers:Tap and Jaron sister:P!ATD
engaged to Donald Serrot
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
The Law 'Shark'
Gender: None specified
Rank: Medium-in-training
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:43 pm
Posts: 565
Quote:
he of course thought iris was dahlia
Uh...No he didn't, that was never implied in the game at all.
~Beware of the Shark - He'll bite!~
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
The angels have the phone box.
Gender: Female
Location: Somewhere inside my own mind.
Rank: Desk Jockey
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 5:30 am
Posts: 60
rydus65 wrote:
Spoiler: text
I was already thinking of making the comparison. I think they're both slightly tragic characters, basically good people hwo did stupid things. However, I believe Godot was in more of a position to understand what he was doing (Acro seemed possibly clinically depressed, and therefore could pleade temporary (or not so temoporary) insanity), and therefore is more in the wrong. Godot was acting out of selfishness, wanting both revenge and to look like a hero. His love for Mia seemed like more of an excuse rather than a reason for his actions.
"Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, set a fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life." ~Terry Pratchett
Avatar credit 3toh@deviantart
Avatar credit 3toh@deviantart
Re: Was Godot's acting in 3-5 justified?
prosecuting never looked so good ;)
Gender: Male
Location: spain (UK origin)
Rank: Decisive Witness
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2011 1:17 pm
Posts: 288
The writer of the script was clever enough to leave it open to debate by making Godot basically say "maybe i did and maybe i didn't" so that a debate like this would be opened up.
But in my opinion if he just burned the damn letter in the first place and settled his grudge with wright like a man then we would still have iris free and more importantly...
! MYSTIC MISTYYYYYYYYYYY!
When life gives you lemons, leave them and get a lollipop instead.
CHOO CHOO! ALL ABOARD THE HYPE EXPRESS!
CHOO CHOO! ALL ABOARD THE HYPE EXPRESS!
Page 1 of 1
[ 17 posts ]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 5 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
News
Site map
SitemapIndex
RSS Feed