That would solve all those "MY GOD. THAT PART WAS EPIC. Too bad I'll have to replay the entire trail again to do it again though.
" momments I have.
| Court Records https://forums.court-records.net/ |
|
| You know what would be neat in future AA games? https://forums.court-records.net/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=8413 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Superninfreak [ Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
If in the case selection for a new game, you could choose the chapter to start at too. Like say there was 1 really awesome trial but it was at the end of the case, you could skip to there if you wanted. Of cource you would have to have already beaten a chapter to unlock it though. |
|
| Author: | Ayasato-chan [ Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
Interesting, and it would be cool. But I doubt it'd happen. |
|
| Author: | Sheepshifter [ Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
That would solve all those "MY GOD. THAT PART WAS EPIC. Too bad I'll have to replay the entire trail again to do it again though. " momments I have.
|
|
| Author: | Mr. Bear Jew [ Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
Terrible idea. Just plain terrible. I'm sorry, but I had to say it like that. |
|
| Author: | Anders [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 3:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
Actually I think that would be a good idea. If you've already beaten the case, there really isn't much reason for them to force you to go through the slower sections that you don't like. It's just another way to make the best bits of the game more easily accessible to fans. They could definitely stand to speed up the process of the investigation phase too, particularly with moving. It gets awfully annoying having to traverse a whole bunch of places one step at a time just to go to a particular location. I'm really surprised that they didn't streamline it for AJ, as that would've been the perfect opportunity. |
|
| Author: | MoronSonOfBoron [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 4:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
What? CHAPTER SELECT? Does this look like a hentai game to you? |
|
| Author: | DynoStretch [ Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
MoronSonOfBoron wrote: What? CHAPTER SELECT? Does this look like a hentai game to you? This from the guy with an Olga/Daryan pr0n avatar. |
|
| Author: | Phoenix_Apollo [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 12:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
How about two versions of Trial 1? One version for noobs and one version for vets? |
|
| Author: | Superninfreak [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 2:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
Phoenix_Apollo wrote: How about two versions of Trial 1? One version for noobs and one version for vets? How would that work? They would have to have basically 2 differant trials, the script would be differant. The most I can think of that they can do without having to much differance is what they already do, ask you if you need them to brief you on how court works. |
|
| Author: | Phoenix_Apollo [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
Superninfreak wrote: Phoenix_Apollo wrote: How about two versions of Trial 1? One version for noobs and one version for vets? How would that work? They would have to have basically 2 differant trials, the script would be differant. The most I can think of that they can do without having to much differance is what they already do, ask you if you need them to brief you on how court works. Well, the case would be the same, but things like how it happened and the story behind it will change slightly. There would be the same number of characters, and everything, but Trial 1 for the Vets would be a harder version of the Noob Trial 1. |
|
| Author: | javad [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 10:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
yes it is a good idea |
|
| Author: | Gerkuman [ Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
you promised me youd sort out your grammar javad im very disappointed with you please fix it |
|
| Author: | MercuryKitten [ Mon Apr 07, 2008 4:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
That would be great, especially if I'm trying to find quotes or inside jokes I missed. I once played through all of Spoiler: 2-4 |
|
| Author: | Zarkanorf [ Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
Phoenix_Apollo wrote: How about two versions of Trial 1? One version for noobs and one version for vets? That's what you call a tutorial, and why you can skip those things called tutorials. >D> |
|
| Author: | Mr. Bear Jew [ Wed Apr 16, 2008 6:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
Anders wrote: Actually I think that would be a good idea. If you've already beaten the case, there really isn't much reason for them to force you to go through the slower sections that you don't like. It's just another way to make the best bits of the game more easily accessible to fans. They could definitely stand to speed up the process of the investigation phase too, particularly with moving. It gets awfully annoying having to traverse a whole bunch of places one step at a time just to go to a particular location. I'm really surprised that they didn't streamline it for AJ, as that would've been the perfect opportunity. You really can't play one part of the game without playing the other first. Sure, it sounds good on paper but it would ruin the "moment" and that part which totally just blew your mind. It all builds up and there's that single glorious "GOTCHA!" moment that you can relive again and again. Also, the court scenes are nice but without investigation scenes where would they be? To neglect one part would be to neglect the whole thing. It's not called an 'adventure game' for nothing. EDIT: Y'know, on second thought...I guess it would kinda help to relive that moment. Curse my narrow mindedness! 
|
|
| Author: | Phoenix_Apollo [ Thu Apr 17, 2008 10:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: You know what would be neat in future AA games? |
Zarkanorf wrote: Phoenix_Apollo wrote: How about two versions of Trial 1? One version for noobs and one version for vets? That's what you call a tutorial, and why you can skip those things called tutorials. >D> Let me ask you: did you skip the tutorial in JFA? Because 3 cases doesn't sound like a lot. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|