Court Records https://forums.court-records.net/ |
|
Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) https://forums.court-records.net/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=27494 |
Page 4 of 7 |
Author: | Jonathan [ Thu Oct 31, 2013 12:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Are the spoiler tags for case 5 really necessary in this thread?Sigh Anyway Spoiler: |
Author: | tb2fan [ Thu Oct 31, 2013 3:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Spoiler: Okay... here we go. Spoiler: If we follow this line of reasoning, then... Spoiler: So without further ado... Spoiler: You are welcome. |
Author: | henke37 [ Thu Oct 31, 2013 5:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Except no. They didn't care for the moon rock. The client only wanted to screw with the space program. There were no mention at all about the moon rock. |
Author: | Rubia Ryu the Royal [ Thu Oct 31, 2013 5:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
I've only played through the Japanese, so in case I missed something, I'm okay with that. I swear there was a mention to the possibilities that the moon rock could be used for - advances in tech or whatnot - and many countries were after the material. Whether or not those were just rumors, I'm not sure, but it does sound suspiciously like something else. Given that GT and AA are in the same universe, this may be a reference. I don't think the games are directly related in the least, but it does make an interesting point. |
Author: | TaylorHyuuga [ Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
[quote="AnsweringNOW"] Spoiler: Big spoilers here!! Spoiler: |
Author: | Rubia Ryu the Royal [ Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:46 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
I went through the early part of the investigation in case 5 again. Spoiler: |
Author: | BonnyMono [ Sat Nov 02, 2013 5:36 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Rubia Silve Ryu wrote: I went through the early part of the investigation in case 5 again. Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | Bombo [ Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Spoiler: |
Author: | henke37 [ Sat Nov 02, 2013 10:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Spoiler: |
Author: | Louise [ Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Jonathan wrote: Are the spoiler tags for case 5 really necessary in this thread?Sigh Anyway Spoiler: Spoiler: EDIT: I almost forgot, but the phantom's theme is AWESOME. |
Author: | Thane [ Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Spoiler: Last boss spoiler |
Author: | linkenski [ Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
I admit Spoiler: Bobby FullB |
Author: | Ahugespoon [ Sat Nov 02, 2013 11:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Spoiler: |
Author: | tb2fan [ Sun Nov 03, 2013 1:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Quote: Except no. They didn't care for the moon rock. The client only wanted to screw with the space program. There were no mention at all about the moon rock. Spoiler: |
Author: | TheBlarghMan [ Sun Nov 03, 2013 2:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
tb2fan wrote: Quote: Except no. They didn't care for the moon rock. The client only wanted to screw with the space program. There were no mention at all about the moon rock. Spoiler: My personal theory is that not just the moon rock, but the entire space station had nothing to do with the original intentions of whatever country employees the Phantom at all. Spoiler: |
Author: | Rubia Ryu the Royal [ Sun Nov 03, 2013 4:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
TheBlarghMan wrote: Spoiler: Interesting theory. Spoiler: |
Author: | Mr. Bear Jew [ Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Spoiler: Case 5 villain |
Author: | Tiagofvarela [ Sun Nov 03, 2013 10:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Mr. Bear Jew wrote: Spoiler: Case 5 villain Spoiler: Emotions |
Author: | Coffee Prosecutor [ Sat Nov 09, 2013 5:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Tiagofvarela wrote: Mr. Bear Jew wrote: Spoiler: Case 5 villain Spoiler: Emotions Spoiler: |
Author: | Rubia Ryu the Royal [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Coffee Prosecutor wrote: Tiagofvarela wrote: Mr. Bear Jew wrote: Spoiler: Case 5 villain Spoiler: Emotions Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | Belldandy07 [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Re: Case 5 Hi everyone:-) I found Case 5 a tremendous disappointment, as there was an immense focus on Athena Cykes and her trauma. Very little focus was on Apollo's trauma, other than his issues against Athena. Phoenix was a billion percent more concerned with rescuing Athena over helping Apollo to heal, and saving his daughter. Not saying he should've ignored Athena; I just wish he would've been equally focused on Apollo and Trucy. The cute, cuddly new attorney wasn't the only one going through mental breakdowns. The more I got into Case 5, the more' I went 'uh, what about Clay?' Phoenix never mentioned him, and if he did, I must've missed that short mention. Athena never mentioned him, as she had to recover from her own horrible, earth-shattering trauma. I just felt Apollo, Trucy and Clay were benched in favor of the adorable, energetic attorney with a tragic past. Wait, who's Clay again? |
Author: | Coffee Prosecutor [ Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
I didn't really care that much about Apollo, tbh. I felt like he was a jerk and that whole act seemed like so ridiculously forced at that moment... |
Author: | EdgeworthxOldbag [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 10:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Man I was scarred when you had to choose who the phantom was, I'm out we're all out of characters And then he pulls out the Starbuck mask and I'm like "I knew it!" |
Author: | BonnyMono [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 5:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
EdgeworthxOldbag wrote: Man I was scarred when you had to choose who the phantom was, I'm out we're all out of characters And then he pulls out the Starbuck mask and I'm like "I knew it!" You might want to use spoiler tags for this one, it's a pretty damn spoily fact you just stated. |
Author: | Bad Player [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
BonnyMono wrote: EdgeworthxOldbag wrote: Man I was scarred when you had to choose who the phantom was, I'm out we're all out of characters And then he pulls out the Starbuck mask and I'm like "I knew it!" You might want to use spoiler tags for this one, it's a pretty damn spoily fact you just stated. This thread is marked for spoilers, so it's no problem~ (People usually use spoiler tags everywhere just in case, since the game is still relatively new, but it's fine to not use spoiler tags in threads marked as spoilers.) |
Author: | Tiagofvarela [ Tue Nov 12, 2013 7:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Bad Player wrote: BonnyMono wrote: EdgeworthxOldbag wrote: Man I was scarred when you had to choose who the phantom was, I'm out we're all out of characters And then he pulls out the Starbuck mask and I'm like "I knew it!" You might want to use spoiler tags for this one, it's a pretty damn spoily fact you just stated. This thread is marked for spoilers, so it's no problem~ (People usually use spoiler tags everywhere just in case, since the game is still relatively new, but it's fine to not use spoiler tags in threads marked as spoilers.) According to the main post: Bolt Storm wrote: They should be used when [...] or the later parts of case five.
|
Author: | Bad Player [ Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Okay, well... That was also when the game was first released in Japan. We required that everyone use spoiler tags for everything everywhere--even the thread called "Spoiler Discussion." But now the game has been out in English for a few weeks. So untagged spoilers in a spoiler-tagged thread are okay. Also note that the first post says "should," not "must." |
Author: | BonnyMono [ Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
@BP: Well, there are people who haven't finished the game yet. Using spoiler tags is way better than leaving the spoiler to burn people's eyes. |
Author: | Lusankya [ Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
BonnyMono wrote: @BP: Well, there are people who haven't finished the game yet. Using spoiler tags is way better than leaving the spoiler to burn people's eyes. They deserve it when they think they won't get spoiled in a thread called "Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS)". |
Author: | BonnyMono [ Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Lusankya wrote: BonnyMono wrote: @BP: Well, there are people who haven't finished the game yet. Using spoiler tags is way better than leaving the spoiler to burn people's eyes. They deserve it when they think they won't get spoiled in a thread called "Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS)". Oops, I thought it was the other thread. Terribly sorry for the inconvenience. |
Author: | Bad Player [ Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
BonnyMono wrote: Lusankya wrote: BonnyMono wrote: @BP: Well, there are people who haven't finished the game yet. Using spoiler tags is way better than leaving the spoiler to burn people's eyes. They deserve it when they think they won't get spoiled in a thread called "Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS)". Oops, I thought it was the other thread. Terribly sorry for the inconvenience. No problem. With all these active DD threads running around, it can sometimes be hard to remember exactly which threads are spoiler-tagged and which ones aren't. |
Author: | Tiagofvarela [ Wed Nov 13, 2013 6:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Bad Player wrote: Okay, well... That was also when the game was first released in Japan. We required that everyone use spoiler tags for everything everywhere--even the thread called "Spoiler Discussion." But now the game has been out in English for a few weeks. So untagged spoilers in a spoiler-tagged thread are okay. Also note that the first post says "should," not "must." Yes, I completly agree with you, however, when I read the main post, better be safe than sorry. Although it says "should" it's heavily implied you are to use them, but I guess it's doesn't really make it that clear. |
Author: | BonnyMono [ Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:27 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
I have a question: Spoiler: Tagging just cuz' |
Author: | Ash [ Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
BonnyMono wrote: I have a question: Spoiler: Tagging just cuz' Spoiler: |
Author: | henke37 [ Thu Nov 14, 2013 1:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
It's made clear that the trial wasn't very official and the fact that it wouldn't have happened without the threat is even clearer. |
Author: | Kanji [ Thu Nov 14, 2013 10:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Spoiler: |
Author: | Rubia Ryu the Royal [ Thu Nov 14, 2013 11:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Kanji wrote: Spoiler: 月の石, lit. "moon rock". |
Author: | Katana [ Fri Nov 15, 2013 12:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
Coffee Prosecutor wrote: I didn't really care that much about Apollo, tbh. I felt like he was a jerk and that whole act seemed like so ridiculously forced at that moment... I feel like the only person who actually thought Apollo's big sequence close to the ending was pretty well established and emotional. Think of it from his perspective; you start investigating a case that's very personal to you, and then suddenly, for no apparent reason, your closest co-worker starts lying to you about pretty much EVERYTHING. They avoid questions, they say the whole place is new to them, they can't even claim they've never seen the murder weapon without letting out a tell, etc. You trust them, so you at least find a way to put it out of your head and focus on the trial. But then there was the lighter fingerprints. And then the Lobby 2 security footage. The mere fact that Athena hid her presence *right* at the scene and time of the crime - and was never seen by anyone at the Space Center - seems enormously incriminating. She was practically like Godot being beyond the bridge, through the whole incident. Apollo already knows Athena is very intelligent for her age, and has a mysterious past she won't talk about. Heck, who here was flat-out surprised that the facts pointed to you-know-who being the killer? It wouldn't be the first time the series has had an innocent-looking little girl be an evil mastermind, either. Apollo is a smart man, and he knows to follow the facts. Really, the only thing keeping Athena away from the top of the suspect list at that point was the player's genre-savviness. At that point, it would be really difficult to work alongside someone you VERY strongly suspect of murder. Keep in mind; through it all, despite every piece of evidence (including his own gut talents) pointing her way, Apollo *wanted* to believe Athena. He was bringing himself a lot of pain by coming out with the accusation against her, and he certainly wasn't doing it just to look cool - he basically prompted Wright to come up with counter-arguments to him. One thing we might never quite follow are his motivations to protect his friend Clay. I'm sure some of the player reactions might be different if Clay were a recurring character in the series, always there for Apollo. |
Author: | Delusionist [ Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
^This. The struggle inside Apollo's heart was handled in the best possible way, not too over the top but not completely overshadowed by the new characters' stories. Not also that, but I think his character gained a lot more depth than any other in the game, and more than he had in his own game. |
Author: | Miss All Sunday [ Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case 5 discussion thread (SPOILERS) |
I have some (probably) dumb questions that tie into Case 5... Spoiler: |
Page 4 of 7 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |