Court Records https://forums.court-records.net/ |
|
Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) https://forums.court-records.net/viewtopic.php?f=49&t=31978 |
Page 1 of 5 |
Author: | Bolt Storm [ Wed Jun 08, 2016 3:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
This is a general discussion thread for AA6 episode two, "Turnabout Magic Show"! Please use spoiler tags when discussing any plot points of the episode that haven't been officially announced. |
Author: | Oliver [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: |
Author: | Lhancat [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: |
Author: | Thunder84 [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
So...that was a case, I guess. Spoiler: |
Author: | Oliver [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Lhancat wrote: Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | Thunder84 [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Oliver wrote: Lhancat wrote: Spoiler: Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | Bolt Storm [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:39 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
I'll write up my full thoughts tomorrow, but here is an accurate audio representation of this case Also to answer the above questions: Spoiler: 6-2 general |
Author: | SuperAj3 [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
This case was fantastic! I was hooked the whole time! Spoiler: Trial spoiler stuff |
Author: | hinata2000100 [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:50 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Oliver wrote: Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | Oliver [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
hinata2000100 wrote: Oliver wrote: Spoiler: Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | ApolloGrimoire [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: |
Author: | Yash K. Productions [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Oliver wrote: Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | Thunder84 [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
ApolloGrimoire wrote: Spoiler: I didn't completely understand it but I think it went something like this... Spoiler: |
Author: | ApolloGrimoire [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: |
Author: | Thunder84 [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
ApolloGrimoire wrote: Spoiler: Hopefully Bolt will upload the video soon. It's really hard to understand without seeing it. Also the case took 5 hours, so... |
Author: | Chauzu [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 5:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Second case was also good! The game has been very enjoyable so far. Spoiler: About the Prosecutor Spoiler: About the Culprit Spoiler: About the Case |
Author: | ApolloGrimoire [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 5:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: |
Author: | Slammer [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 6:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Chauzu wrote: Second case was also good! The game has been very enjoyable so far. Spoiler: About the Culprit Spoiler: About the Case Thunder84 wrote: Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | WarChild [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: Spoiler: Other things to note: Spoiler: |
Author: | Chauzu [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | Slammer [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
WarChild wrote: Spoiler: Spoiler: |
Author: | Bolt Storm [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 7:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Slammer wrote: WarChild wrote: Spoiler: Spoiler: Spoiler: 6-2 backstory |
Author: | Bad Player [ Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:10 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
oh god yamashino is awesomeeeeeee Spoiler: EDIT: Finished the case. Spoiler: |
Author: | Doctor Nanjo [ Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Bad Player wrote: oh god yamashino is awesomeeeeeee Agreed. Spoiler: Case 2 Spoilers |
Author: | Manecleis [ Mon Jun 13, 2016 5:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Oliver wrote: Spoiler: potential spoiler case 5 I seriously hope this is a joke because I'm not expected to find a case 5 spoiler without warning here. |
Author: | Thunder84 [ Mon Jun 13, 2016 5:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Manecleis wrote: Oliver wrote: Spoiler: potential spoiler case 5 I seriously hope this is a joke because I'm not expected to find a case 5 spoiler without warning here. Spoiler: Answer to Manecleis |
Author: | Bad Player [ Mon Jun 13, 2016 11:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Haven't read all the tags in this thread, but thinking back, there's something that doesn't make sense to me... Spoiler: case 2 |
Author: | linkenski [ Mon Jun 20, 2016 10:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
So, is this really only a 1-day case? If so, how come? I just beat the first case myself and going by the setup and everything I love the premise for this case and the direction this game is taking in general. |
Author: | Bad Player [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
linkenski wrote: So, is this really only a 1-day case? If so, how come? I just beat the first case myself and going by the setup and everything I love the premise for this case and the direction this game is taking in general. clearly because the developers are lazy |
Author: | Klonoahedgehog [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
linkenski wrote: So, is this really only a 1-day case? If so, how come? I just beat the first case myself and going by the setup and everything I love the premise for this case and the direction this game is taking in general. Probably to give Trucy as little screen time as possible while still giving her just enough to justify not kicking her off the cast. |
Author: | Thunder84 [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 12:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Bad Player wrote: linkenski wrote: So, is this really only a 1-day case? If so, how come? I just beat the first case myself and going by the setup and everything I love the premise for this case and the direction this game is taking in general. clearly because the developers are lazy Not sure if this is sarcasm or not, but I don't see this as laziness at all. Both the investigation and trial are quite long and detailed IMO. |
Author: | Bad Player [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 1:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Thunder84 wrote: Bad Player wrote: linkenski wrote: So, is this really only a 1-day case? If so, how come? I just beat the first case myself and going by the setup and everything I love the premise for this case and the direction this game is taking in general. clearly because the developers are lazy Not sure if this is sarcasm or not, but I don't see this as laziness at all. Both the investigation and trial are quite long and detailed IMO. sarcasm |
Author: | Thunder84 [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 1:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Bad Player wrote: Thunder84 wrote: Bad Player wrote: clearly because the developers are lazy Not sure if this is sarcasm or not, but I don't see this as laziness at all. Both the investigation and trial are quite long and detailed IMO. sarcasm As you can see, I clearly am the best at recognizing sarcasm |
Author: | linkenski [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 2:05 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
So wait... it's LITERALLY a 1-day episode? It doesn't switch over to Nick afterwards or anything? So there's only case 3 and 5 as actual fully fledged cases? O.o |
Author: | Klonoahedgehog [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 2:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
linkenski wrote: So wait... it's LITERALLY a 1-day episode? It doesn't switch over to Nick afterwards or anything? So there's only case 3 and 5 as actual fully fledged cases? O.o Unfortunately yes. On the plus side this means that if i'm thinking this right, Athena is only an assistant for one and a half cases. |
Author: | Thunder84 [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
linkenski wrote: So wait... it's LITERALLY a 1-day episode? It doesn't switch over to Nick afterwards or anything? So there's only case 3 and 5 as actual fully fledged cases? O.o Well...not really. It's one investigation and one trial segment. However, both are extremely long (the case was 5-6 hours I believe). This is indeed a full fledged case. |
Author: | Proyectil [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 5:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
It just changes the investigation-trial-investigation-trial structure, but I think it's a full-fledged case nevertheless. We will have to wait and see how the change works, I mean, I suppose that they made the change for a reason. |
Author: | linkenski [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 8:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
I can't really think of any beyond "It would be cool" or "I don't want to write two entire days of this case. It's too much plotting!" |
Author: | Klonoahedgehog [ Tue Jun 21, 2016 9:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
Maybe they just wanted to get Trucy's case over with as fast as possible before moving on to Maya's in case 3 as that one's traditional length? |
Author: | Thunder84 [ Wed Jun 22, 2016 3:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Case two discussion thread (tagged spoilers) |
linkenski wrote: I can't really think of any beyond "It would be cool" or "I don't want to write two entire days of this case. It's too much plotting!" With how the case is written, splitting it into two trial days would not have worked at all IMO. Honestly, I'm very happy that this case is one day, since two days would drop the quality significantly. |
Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |