Board index » Phoenix Wright » Defendant's Lobby » The Hydeout (GS4)

Page 1 of 1[ 20 posts ]
 


I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title

Gender: Male

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:59 am

Posts: 122

It took me forever to figure this out, as it seemed out of character for Zak, but I think I have. I think I found the reasons behind Zak trying to ruin Phoenix's life: He thought he ruined his and was going to ruin his daughters.

Zak didn't know Phoenix had gotten a piece of forged evidence from elsewhere. He must have assumed Phoenix had forged it, and that Zak had judged his character wrong. Since Phoenix had beaten him at poker, thats why he thought he had good character. So he assumed he was cheating when they played. Also, using that forged paper made it so Zak had to flee, which also ruined his life. He'd never get to perform magic again, and he wouldn't be able to raise his daughter.

Now Zak starts to hear that Phoenix is raising Trucy. This worries him, because he thinks he'd be a horrible influence on her, as he still thinks he's a cheater. Then he hears about Phoenix's unbeaten record for 7 years in poker. Knowing his daughter's power, he also assumes Phoenix is using her to keep up his "lie". Now he thinks Phoenix needs to stay away from his daughter. So he arranges for Phoenix to lose everything. This is why he also "clears" Valant of any wrong doing with his thing. He assumes Valant would be better then Phoenix, and he's hoping she goes to him
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

I'd say

Gender: Male

Location: Belgium

Rank: Moderators

Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 10:49 am

Posts: 2480

or....He's a Jerk.
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

Good 'til the last drop.

Gender: Male

Rank: Ace Attorney

Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:45 pm

Posts: 1562

I haven't played all of AJ yet, but ive played 4-1 and spoiled myself on everything else, so i kind of understand.
But have you also figured out Kirstoph's motive in 4-1?
Image
By Lind_L_Tailor^
Creator and head guy thing of the Ace Attorney Awards! Come vote to help end meaningless debates! With style. :butzthumbs:
:damon:
^^ Click The Gant!
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

Gender: None specified

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:09 am

Posts: 73

If we hold this theory as correct, an explanation becomes clear. Zak Gramarye was in cahoots with Kristoph Gavin. Remember, Zak would be considered dead in absentia. So, to make sure that Phoenix would be separated from Trucy, he had Gavin to kill him and set up Phoenix. Zak knew about the laws of missing people, and so to not waste his remaining hours considered alive, he used those hours to separate Phoenix from Trucy. That would explain the reason why Gavin would kill him if they just knew each other from one short conversation.
Image
The Apollo Justice Appreciation Thread
The Awesome Signature is brought to you by the The Vickinator
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title

Ooh, a real drumroll. Nice.

Gender: Male

Location: By my computer.

Rank: Prosecutor

Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:05 pm

Posts: 802

Zak respects the people who beat him at poker. He's about to die in a few days and hasn't even bothered to make any conact with Trucy so he wouldn't care about it. (don't go shouting about Misty Fey because I have a piece of evidence to contradict it though it could be the same for Zak...) Zak had already planned to disappear before the trial no matter what happened. Zak was about to 'die' in a few days so why get murdered? And Zak had no idea who Gavin was at the time. Also, Zak knew that
Spoiler:
Valant killed Magnifi.
To be honest, I'd rather have a hobo cheater as a daughter than a murderer. He also ruined Valant's life by passing the performance rights to Trucy and not him. And from the pre court scene, I say he trusts Phoenix alot.
Quote:
I am in your capable hands.
. He only clears Valant's name because it doesn't matter for him beacause he's dead and doesn't want more suffering for Valant. Whew! I'm done now.
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title

Gender: Male

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:59 am

Posts: 122

So you say he wants to ruin Valant's life, but then he goes and clears Valant's name which shows he does care about Valant, even though Valant ruined his life.

Zak did not plan to disappear. It was a contingency plan.

He did trust Phoenix, but after the forged evidence incident, he probably saw Phoenix in a different light
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

nuuuuu, stoooooop

Gender: Female

Location: America

Rank: Admin

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:16 am

Posts: 5255

et91 wrote:
INow Zak starts to hear that Phoenix is raising Trucy. This worries him, because he thinks he'd be a horrible influence on her, as he still thinks he's a cheater. Then he hears about Phoenix's unbeaten record for 7 years in poker. Knowing his daughter's power, he also assumes Phoenix is using her to keep up his "lie". Now he thinks Phoenix needs to stay away from his daughter. So he arranges for Phoenix to lose everything. This is why he also "clears" Valant of any wrong doing with his thing. He assumes Valant would be better then Phoenix, and he's hoping she goes to him


But it was Zak who told Trucy to go to Phoenix in the first place, two weeks after the trial was over. So either the two of them were around together up until then, and Zak told Trucy to stay with Phoenix even suspecting he was a lying forger who ruined him (which contradicts your theory) or the last time father and daughter saw each other was at the court house, and Trucy was on her own for those two weeks or maybe in an orphanage of some kind (meaning he set up this "escape plan" without any real intentions of securing his daughter's future at all).

Remember that all Zak had to do in that flashback case to prove his innocence was to produce the ripped out journal sheet he had which said that Magnifi had passed on his rights to him. It would have showed that he passed Magnifi's test and had no motive for killing him, and left no room for Kristoph's forged page. The fact that he didn't just tell everyone the full truth means he didn't really intend on being found innocent anyway, or maybe he really did think Valant had done it and was covering for him (though if he really gave a shit about Valant he should have left the tricks to him...)

Personally I think Zak wanted out of the Troupe and decided the trial was a good way to make the most explosive exit possible.
ImageImage
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title

Gender: Male

Location: England

Rank: Prosecutor

Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 7:03 pm

Posts: 931

Croik wrote:
Remember that all Zak had to do in that flashback case to prove his innocence was to produce the ripped out journal sheet he had which said that Magnifi had passed on his rights to him. It would have showed that he passed Magnifi's test and had no motive for killing him


It wouldn't necessarily prove that Zak had no motive, because his motive was supposed to be that he was being blackmailed by Magnifi. Having Magnifi's tricks wouldn't remove that element.
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title

Gender: Male

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:59 am

Posts: 122

Croik wrote:
et91 wrote:
INow Zak starts to hear that Phoenix is raising Trucy. This worries him, because he thinks he'd be a horrible influence on her, as he still thinks he's a cheater. Then he hears about Phoenix's unbeaten record for 7 years in poker. Knowing his daughter's power, he also assumes Phoenix is using her to keep up his "lie". Now he thinks Phoenix needs to stay away from his daughter. So he arranges for Phoenix to lose everything. This is why he also "clears" Valant of any wrong doing with his thing. He assumes Valant would be better then Phoenix, and he's hoping she goes to him


But it was Zak who told Trucy to go to Phoenix in the first place, two weeks after the trial was over. So either the two of them were around together up until then, and Zak told Trucy to stay with Phoenix even suspecting he was a lying forger who ruined him (which contradicts your theory) or the last time father and daughter saw each other was at the court house, and Trucy was on her own for those two weeks or maybe in an orphanage of some kind (meaning he set up this "escape plan" without any real intentions of securing his daughter's future at all).

Remember that all Zak had to do in that flashback case to prove his innocence was to produce the ripped out journal sheet he had which said that Magnifi had passed on his rights to him. It would have showed that he passed Magnifi's test and had no motive for killing him, and left no room for Kristoph's forged page. The fact that he didn't just tell everyone the full truth means he didn't really intend on being found innocent anyway, or maybe he really did think Valant had done it and was covering for him (though if he really gave a shit about Valant he should have left the tricks to him...)

Personally I think Zak wanted out of the Troupe and decided the trial was a good way to make the most explosive exit possible.


Any prosecutor could have used the true journal page against Zak. Klavier could argue that Zak was just making sure he got the rights and once he did, he no longer wanted to be blackmailed by Magnifi so he killed him as well.

As far as caring about Valant, thats the worst argument I've ever seen: So because Valant ruined his life, he should have left the rights to him instead of his own flesh and blood? Family comes before friends. Always. And he still did care about Valant afterwards. Why would he clear his name? It was Valant that didn't give a shit about anyone but himself. He only "felt remorse" after it became clear he wouldn't get the rights to the magic.
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

nuuuuu, stoooooop

Gender: Female

Location: America

Rank: Admin

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:16 am

Posts: 5255

et91 wrote:
[Any prosecutor could have used the true journal page against Zak. Klavier could argue that Zak was just making sure he got the rights and once he did, he no longer wanted to be blackmailed by Magnifi so he killed him as well.


Not having the journal page to explain the blank in the diary is what made Zak so suspicious in the first place - the fact that Magnifi wrote nothing after Zak appeared placed the blame on him. If Zak had proved that he had passed Magnifi's test and obtained his life's work, that shifts the motive on to Valant. They both had equal motive to not want to be blackmailed anymore, but it was Valant who had been snubbed. If the police had known that from the beginning I think they would have taken a closer look at him.

If you add to that the fact that Phoenix was able to prove the murder took place later, after Zak had already left, they could have won. No matter when Zak had decided to show that page, whether it be before or during the trial, it would have helped his case.

Quote:
As far as caring about Valant, thats the worst argument I've ever seen: So because Valant ruined his life, he should have left the rights to him instead of his own flesh and blood? Family comes before friends. Always. And he still did care about Valant afterwards. Why would he clear his name? It was Valant that didn't give a shit about anyone but himself. He only "felt remorse" after it became clear he wouldn't get the rights to the magic.


Okay, maybe not give Valant the rights. But he certainly could have left his will behind before making a break for it. At least then Trucy would know that her father disappeared so that she could oneday inherit those tricks, and maybe then Valant wouldn't have been broadsided only days before his much-hyped new magic show. If his career wasn't over before, it probably is now.
ImageImage
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title

Gender: Male

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:59 am

Posts: 122

Croik wrote:
et91 wrote:
[Any prosecutor could have used the true journal page against Zak. Klavier could argue that Zak was just making sure he got the rights and once he did, he no longer wanted to be blackmailed by Magnifi so he killed him as well.


Not having the journal page to explain the blank in the diary is what made Zak so suspicious in the first place - the fact that Magnifi wrote nothing after Zak appeared placed the blame on him. If Zak had proved that he had passed Magnifi's test and obtained his life's work, that shifts the motive on to Valant. They both had equal motive to not want to be blackmailed anymore, but it was Valant who had been snubbed. If the police had known that from the beginning I think they would have taken a closer look at him.

If you add to that the fact that Phoenix was able to prove the murder took place later, after Zak had already left, they could have won. No matter when Zak had decided to show that page, whether it be before or during the trial, it would have helped his case.

Quote:
As far as caring about Valant, thats the worst argument I've ever seen: So because Valant ruined his life, he should have left the rights to him instead of his own flesh and blood? Family comes before friends. Always. And he still did care about Valant afterwards. Why would he clear his name? It was Valant that didn't give a shit about anyone but himself. He only "felt remorse" after it became clear he wouldn't get the rights to the magic.


Okay, maybe not give Valant the rights. But he certainly could have left his will behind before making a break for it. At least then Trucy would know that her father disappeared so that she could oneday inherit those tricks, and maybe then Valant wouldn't have been broadsided only days before his much-hyped new magic show. If his career wasn't over before, it probably is now.


For the first part, I still don't think he would have won the case. There's still reasonable doubt(which is basically the reverse of what it is in America), which means he would not have been found not guilty. And Phoenix wasn't able to prove that until long after.

And for the second part, thats mostly Phoenix's fault. Phoenix didn't give Valant any warning at all that it was coming up. And Zak didn't leave a will because he didn't think he'd need it.
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

nuuuuu, stoooooop

Gender: Female

Location: America

Rank: Admin

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 5:16 am

Posts: 5255

As the trial was going though, Phoenix was winning. He had Valant against the wall until Klavier reminded him of the journal. Without that missing evidence to fall back on, Phoenix could have easily pushed Valant into confessing that Magnifi's death was a suicide. Before then, Phoenix was able to get the correct verdict for every case he took, so I don't see how you can assume that Zak's case was un-winnable even if every piece of evidence was correct and available.

et91 wrote:
And for the second part, thats mostly Phoenix's fault. Phoenix didn't give Valant any warning at all that it was coming up. And Zak didn't leave a will because he didn't think he'd need it.


But the game does indicate that Zak planned ahead of the trial to escape (whether he planned to escape even if the trial was going his way is still up to debate). He told Phoenix "I can't be found guilty" and had already made a plan with Trucy before the trial even started. And I'm sure he must have realized that if he fled from a court of law, he wouldn't exactly be allowed to come back right away. How could he think to himself it wasn't necessary? All in all, he was pretty careless.
ImageImage
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

Cross-examining your posts!

Gender: Male

Location: Michigan

Rank: Medium-in-training

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:52 pm

Posts: 478

Honestly, I don't think the creators thought it out this well. They basically make it come off as if he is just a jerk. Perhaps it may be elaborated upon in the future.
Formerly Avenger...
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title

Gender: Male

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 2:59 am

Posts: 122

FSTA wrote:
Honestly, I don't think the creators thought it out this well. They basically make it come off as if he is just a jerk. Perhaps it may be elaborated upon in the future.


Basically the Zak of 4-4 and the Zak of 4-1 were different characters imo. I'm trying to make it make sense
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title

Badass

Gender: Male

Rank: Desk Jockey

Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 3:30 pm

Posts: 62

The one thing that's very clear to me is that Shadi/Zak set up his trap to closely parallel the fateful trial--just as Phoenix received forged evidence which he unwittingly presented, ruining his reputation as an attorney, the trap was described as slipping him a false card, so at the showdown he would be caught 'cheating.' What this means for Zak's motivation, I'm not sure...but neither of the Gramarye men seem to be very good people, anyway...
"My name Is Diego Armando. You destroyed my life. Go back to Hell."
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

Sig and Avie created by awesome Vicki!!

Gender: Female

Location: If I'm Online, I must be at my computer (duh)

Rank: Medium-in-training

Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2008 8:46 pm

Posts: 598

I'm not sure if someone said this, but I needed to put this out there.

It is my belief that Zak knew the forged evidence wasn't Phoenix's fault

Spoiler: Game Script Circumstantial Evidence
???:
Um, uh...
Here.

Phoenix:
What's this...?

???:
I dunno! I just got it over
there in the hall.

???:
They told me to give it to the
"old boy in the blue suit with
the spiky hair".

???:
They said it was really
important!

Enigmar:
...What's this?
A memo for you or some such?

Phoenix:
Hmm... Not from the looks
of it.

Phoenix:
(What is this? Looks like a
page from someone's diary.)


Also, during the point that Phoenix was accused of presenting the forged evidence, Zak was there. Phoenix objects that he didn't prepare the evidence; Zak was there. Zak probably would tell whether he was lying, right?

Also, I have a hard time Zak would feel that way about Phoenix about this when this happened:
Spoiler: More Game Script
Trucy:
...Mr. Attorney. Daddy told
me about you.

Trucy:
He said I could trust you.


or this

Spoiler: More
Zak:
Is... she well?
Trucy, I mean.

Phoenix:
She's fine.

Phoenix:
I've got her working already.
Hope you don't mind.

Zak:
I hardly need express my
gratitude. But, you have it.


And I think Zak knew that Phoenix didn't forge that evidence. Unless he doesn't sound so sincere here...
Spoiler: Game Script
Phoenix:
That scrap of paper lost
me my attorney's badge.

Zak:
This is the real page that
was torn from the book.

Zak:
Magnifi gave it to me that
night.

Phoenix:
...You could have told me
this earlier. Like, seven
years earlier.

Zak:
Once again, I must apologize.

Zak:
It was all I could do to
prepare for my escape from
that courtroom.


So far, this is the evidence that Zak thinks Phoenix is a bad man.

Spoiler: Counter-Arguement XD
Zak:
As a magician, it causes me
no end of irritation.

Zak:
To think a mere lawyer might
be out there, pulling the wool
over so many eyes.

Phoenix:
Hey... I just signed your
document for you. Maybe you
could try lightening up?

Zak:
That was that. This is this.

Zak:
For my final competition,
I will destroy your perfect
record, Phoenix Wright.

Zak:
This... will be my final
performance. You are warned.

Phoenix:
(This guy is beyond serious...
So much for a fun evening
of cards.)


But then he says later
Spoiler: Later
Zak:
One can learn much from a
true competition.

Zak:
...Remember this.


My conclusion is that Zak.... is a jerk. Well, honestly, I haven't come to a conclusion due to I haven't thought of it. But that last line, makes me think that Zak was alluding to his actions; because he cheated, he couldn't necessarily be trusted.

I dunno, this whole situation is weird. But I thought I'd bring those up. I know I'm going to be bashed and refuted, but here's the (circumstantial) evidence, ya'll. Overall, I still think that Zak knew that Phoenix did not mean to bring up forged evidence, and that the fact that he wanted to defeat him in poker was probably due to stupid pride.
Image
NEW:V-Day Drabbles! | Flawless Achievement | These Wounds Can Heal | When the Wall Crumbles
Daughter of Xero and Mystic Mina. Sister of Lana & Ulala
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

Powers Fan

Gender: None specified

Rank: Prosecutor

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:46 am

Posts: 703

Zak didn't know Phoenix had gotten a piece of forged evidence from elsewhere. He must have assumed Phoenix had forged it, and that Zak had judged his character wrong.

I disagree. Zak is not an idiot. He knew his daughter had been instructed by someone to give Phoenix a peice of paper, and I'm sure he could tell from Phoenix's reaction that he did not really forge it. Also, if anything, the poker match had assured him that Phoenix was a trustworthy person. He might have realized it was Kristoph from the beginning, since after playing him and seeing who he really was, he fired him. Also, Zak shows him the real page years later.


Also, using that forged paper made it so Zak had to flee, which also ruined his life. He'd never get to perform magic again, and he wouldn't be able to raise his daughter.

Perhaps a bitter Zak might have convinced himself of that after years in hiding, without his daughter or magic, but I doubt he saw it that way at the time. Zak didn't have to flee. He had the real page in his possession, so he could have appealed the verdict. His biggest concern, other than a guilty verdict, was probably keeping that paper in his hands, to ensure he'd one day be able to pass the rights to Trucy.


Now Zak starts to hear that Phoenix is raising Trucy. This worries him, because he thinks he'd be a horrible influence on her, as he still thinks he's a cheater. Then he hears about Phoenix's unbeaten record for 7 years in poker. Knowing his daughter's power, he also assumes Phoenix is using her to keep up his "lie". Now he thinks Phoenix needs to stay away from his daughter. So he arranges for Phoenix to lose everything. This is why he also "clears" Valant of any wrong doing with his thing. He assumes Valant would be better then Phoenix, and he's hoping she goes to him.

Starts to hear? He was the one who told her to go to him in the first place. Phoenix raised her for seven years on essentially no income, even after the girl's father cost him so much. Zak was grateful for this. And if he wanted her to go to Valant, he could have said that to her seven years ago. But Valant wasn't much better off than Phoenix.
:agent-Smith: "You just wish you could talk in Webdings."

Come play Ghost Trick Mafia!
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

spr fckn srs peepz

Gender: Male

Location: Boucherville, Quebec, Canada

Rank: Ace Attorney

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:34 pm

Posts: 2422

Consider the intro : "No matter what happens in court today, I will not be found guilty." (or something to that extent.) Either he feared Valant would kill him/do harm to Trucy if he knew that Zak had the tricks, or he's just a dick. Magic tricks aren't exactly "magic", he planned for this, and would likely have done so if he was about to be declared guilty.
http://vanderlund.blogspot.com - Because the only fantasy worlds I like are those I write myself.
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

Powers Fan

Gender: None specified

Rank: Prosecutor

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 2:46 am

Posts: 703

I believe escaping was only his plan if he was about to be proven guilty.
:agent-Smith: "You just wish you could talk in Webdings."

Come play Ghost Trick Mafia!
Re: I think I figured out Zak's motivation in 4-1(4-4 spoilers)Topic%20Title
User avatar

Fancase Maker

Gender: Male

Rank: Decisive Witness

Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:47 pm

Posts: 274

You know what would be in-character for 4-4 Zak?

If everything he did in 4-1 was just a dumb practical joke that went wrong - the frisking, the card sharp, everything. It certainly fits the mindset of a man who'd vanish from a courtroom and leave his daughter in a near-stranger's hands.
Page 1 of 1 [ 20 posts ] 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  

 Board index » Phoenix Wright » Defendant's Lobby » The Hydeout (GS4)

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
Jump to:  
News News Site map Site map SitemapIndex SitemapIndex RSS Feed RSS Feed Channel list Channel list
Powered by phpBB

phpBB SEO